| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| SIGGRAPH 2004 |
83 |
478 |
17.4% |
| SIGGRAPH 2003 | 81 |
424 |
19 % |
| SIGGRAPH 2002 | 67 | 358 | 18.72 % |
| SIGGRAPH 2001 |
65 |
300 |
21.7 % |
| SIGGRAPH 2000 |
59 |
304 |
19.4 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1999 |
52 |
320 |
16.3 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1998 |
45 |
303 |
14.9 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1997 |
48 |
265 |
18.1 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1996 |
52 |
247 |
21 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1995 |
56 |
257 |
21.8 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1994 |
57 |
242 |
23.6 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1993 |
46 |
225 |
20.4 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1992 |
45 |
213 |
21.1 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1990 | 43 | 210 | 20.5 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1989 | 38 | 190 | 20 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1988 | 34 | 161 | 21.1 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1987 | 33 | 140 | 23.6 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1985 | 35 | 175 | 20 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1984 | 41 | 118 | 34.7 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1981 | 38 | 132 | 28.8 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1980 | 52 | 140 | 37.1 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1979 | 43 | 110 | 39.1 % |
| SIGGRAPH 1978 | 64 | 120 | 53.3 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| EG 2005 | (STAR 6) | (STAR 22) | (STAR 27.3%) |
| EG 2004 |
44 |
243 |
18.1 % |
| EG 2003 |
48 |
221 |
21.7 % |
| EG 2002 |
42 |
233 |
18 % |
| EG 2001 |
54 |
174 |
31 % |
| EG 2000 |
52 |
138 |
37.6 % |
| EG 1999 |
37 |
152 |
24.3 % |
| EG 1998 |
35 |
101 |
34.7 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| ACM Multimedia 2004 | 17 % | ||
| ACM Multimedia 2003 | 20 % |
||
| ACM Multimedia 2002 | 18 % |
||
| ACM Multimedia 2001 | 45 |
280 |
16% (35 % ???) |
| ACM Multimedia 2000 | 36 |
214 |
16.8 % (27 % ???) |
| ACM Multimedia 1997 |
39 |
142 |
27.5 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| IEEE VR 2004 |
26 |
128 |
20.3 % |
| IEEE VR 2001 | 33 |
110 |
30 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| IEEE Visualization 2005 | 88 |
268 |
32.8 % |
| IEEE Visualization 2004 | 46 |
167 |
27.5 % |
| IEEE Visualization 2003 | 63 |
192 |
32.8 % |
| IEEE Visualization 2002 | 58 |
172 |
33.7 % |
| IEEE Visualization 2001 | 51 |
152 |
33.6 % |
| IEEE Visualization 2000 | 52 |
151 |
34.4 % |
| IEEE Visualization 1999 | 47 |
129 |
36.4 % |
| IEEE Visualization 1998 | 50 |
118 |
42.4 % |
| IEEE Visualization 1997 | 44 | 170 | 25.9 % |
| IEEE Visualization 1996 | 43 |
101 |
42.6 % |
| IEEE Visualization 1995 | 41 |
102 |
40.2 % |
| IEEE Visualization 1994 | 41 |
91 |
45.1 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| GI 2003 | 32 |
96 |
33 % |
| GI 2002 |
25 |
96 |
26% |
| GI 2001 | 48 % ??? | ||
| GI 2000 | 28 % ??? | ||
| GI 1992 |
29 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| CASA 2004 |
~33 (+40) |
152 |
~22 % (48 %) |
| CA 2002 |
15 (+18) |
48 |
31 % (68.8 %) |
| CA 1999 |
22 |
||
| CA 1997 | 17 |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| CGI in general |
~ 40 % |
||
| CGI 2001 | 34 | 64 | 53.1 % |
| CGI 2000 |
30 |
92 |
32.6 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| PG 2005 | 102 (37 regular papers + 65 posters) | 267 | 38.2% (13.9 % papers + 24.3 % posters) |
| PG 2004 | 25 % ??? | ||
| PG 2003 | 36 | 182 | 19.8 % |
| PG 2001 | 41 |
112 |
37 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| VRAI 2002 | 66 |
165 |
40 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| I3D 2005 | 26 | 95 | 27.4 % |
| I3D 2003 |
26 |
102 |
26.5 % |
| I3D 2001 | 33 | 100 | 33 % |
| I3D 1999 |
31 % ??? | ||
| I3D 1995 | 34.4 % ??? | ||
| I3D 1992 | 24 | 69 | 34.8 % (43.5 % ???) |
| I3D 1990 | 24 | 82 | 29.3 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| EGCAS 2001 |
16 |
41 |
39 % |
| EGCAS 1999 | 20 |
34 |
58.8 % |
| EGCAS 1998 |
8 |
||
| EGCAS 1997 |
12 |
||
| EGCAS 1996 |
14 |
31 |
45.2 % |
| EGCAS 1995 |
16 |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| SCA 2004 |
37 |
120 |
30.8% |
| SCA 2003 |
38 (23+15) |
101 |
37.6% |
| SCA 2002 | 22 |
53 |
41.5 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| EGVE 2003 |
34 |
75 |
45 % |
| EGVE 1999 | 18 |
31 |
58 % |
| EGVE 1996 |
19 |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| EGSR 2005 | 31 | 93 | 33.3 % |
| EGSR 2004 | 40 % ??? | ||
| EGSR 2003 | 37 % ??? | ||
| EGWR 2002 |
29 |
112 |
25.9 % |
| EGWR 2001 | 29 | 74 | 39.2 % |
| EGWR 1995 | 31 | 68 | 45.6 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| NPAR 2002 |
18 |
40 |
45 % |
| NPAR 2000 | 13 | 27 | 48.1 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| GH 2004 | 14 | 43 | 32.6 % |
| GH 2003 | 13 | 39 | 33.3 % |
| GH 2002 | 14 | 32 | 43.8 % |
| GH 2001 | 14 | 29 | 48.3 % |
| GH 2000 | 14 | ||
| GH 1999 | 12 | ||
| GH 1998 | 16 | ||
| GH 1997 | 15 |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| CHI 2004 |
93 |
572 |
16 % |
| CHI 2003 |
16 % |
||
| CHI 2002 |
61 |
409 |
15 % |
| CHI 2000 | 22 % | ||
| CHI 1999 |
55 |
237 |
23 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| UIST 2001 | 19 % ??? | ||
| UIST 2000 |
26 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| CVPR 2004 |
~200 |
~1200 |
~17 % |
| CVPR 2003 |
209 (149 poster + 60 oral) |
905 |
23.1% (16.5 % posters + 6.6 % oral presentations) |
| CVPR 2001 |
273 (195 poster + 78 oral) |
920 |
30 % (22 % posters + 8% oral presentations) |
| CVPR 2000 |
220 (154 poster + 66 oral) |
466 |
47% (33 % posters + 14.2 % oral presentations) |
| CVPR 1998 |
(42 oral) |
453 |
(9 % oral presentations) |
| CVPR 1997 |
(62 oral) | 544 | (11.4 % oral presentations) |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| ECCV 2004 |
190 (149 poster + 41 oral) |
555 |
34.2 % (26.8% posters + 7.4 % oral presentations) |
| ICCV 2003 |
199 (156 poster + 43 oral) |
960 |
20.7 % (16.2 % posters + 4.5 % oral presentations) |
| ECCV 2002 |
226 (181 poster + 45 oral) |
~600 |
~37.7 % (30.2 % posters + 7.5 % oral presentations) |
| ICCV 2001 |
34 % |
||
| ECCV 2000 |
116 |
266 |
43.6 % |
| ICCV 1999 |
31 % |
||
| ECCV 1998 |
112 (70 poster + 42 oral) |
223 |
50 % (31 % posters + 19 % oral presentations) |
| ICCV 1995 |
26 % |
| Name & year |
Accepted |
Submitted |
Acceptance |
| NIPS 2003 |
198 |
717 |
27.6 % |